🎰 FYI. AC Can Now Ban AP Players. - Table Games - Gambling - Page 4 - Forums - Wizard of Vegas

Most Liked Casino Bonuses in the last 7 days 🍒

Filter:
Sort:
A67444455
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
50 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

For those of you who have been sleeping under a rock, Ken Uston was a notorious card counter who, decades ago, sued Atlantic City casinos.


Enjoy!
Atlantic City Blackjack Guide 2020 | Learn its Rules & Strategy
Valid for casinos
The Man Who Broke Atlantic City - The Atlantic
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
atlantic city blackjack card counting

B6655644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

Answer 1 of 47: As someone who is pretty new to AC gambling (I turned 22 last year). I've also recently starting hitting my 12's against the dealer's up card, 2 - something I've never done in the past.. (Assuming you are not counting cards).


Enjoy!
Atlantic City Blackjack Guide 2020 | Learn its Rules & Strategy
Valid for casinos
counting cards is legal in Atlantic City, but if they suspect you of it they'll ... | Hacker News
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
atlantic city blackjack card counting

BN55TO644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

A shuffle through the Gaming mailbag: Q. Explain to me like I'm 5 why counting cards works for blackjack players. My college buddy said it's�...


Enjoy!
Web Filter Violation
Valid for casinos
The Man Who Broke Atlantic City - The Atlantic
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
How to Count Cards (and Bring Down the House)

TT6335644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
50 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

Here's the Player's Advantage guide to myths about card-counting and. That's similar to the edge the casino has over the majority of blackjack players.. of several Atlantic City casinos and take a "progressive" approach that�...


Enjoy!
Atlantic City Blackjack Guide 2020 | Learn its Rules & Strategy
Valid for casinos
Has anybody played in Atlantic City lately?
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
For those of you who have been sleeping under a rock, Ken Uston was a notorious card counter who, decades ago, sued Atlantic City casinos.
The end result source a ruling that AC casinos could not bar players for being skillful.
The card counters all rejoiced�or did they?
The theory is flawed in its premise, logic, and data.
Why would they do that?
Maximizing profit does not mean making a game so that no one on earth can beat it.
Take full-pay Double Bonus Video Poker as an example.
A sharp player could earn a 100.
Nevertheless, blackjack situational offer the game due to its popularity with the masses, competitive factors with other casinos, and the proven profitability of such games.
The casino can cut the shoe in half.
Heck, the casino can shuffle after every round.
So the card counters are whining that conditions are bad.
Are those conditions so bad in AC?
AC mostly hits soft 17, but H17 is now the default rule nationwide, even in Las Vegas, where they just click for source and do bar players.
I think when I started out, the Trump Plaza and Trop World let you hit out after splitting Aces, but one card to split Aces is now the national standard.
Surrender is also a dying player option.
AC has lots of 8-deck games, but so do the Las Vegas Strip properties, such as the Venetian.
Mandalay Bay has CSMs, atlantic city blackjack card counting bane of counters, and Mandalay Bay manhandles skilled players!
The deteriorating rules have nothing to do with card counters.
The 100 card counters a month have nothing to do with it.
But who cares if technical conditions in AC are as poor as they are in lots of other venues?
Any serious player cares little about penetration, and even less about rules.
When I scout casinos, I barely notice those things.
I notice the games offered, the max bet, and the most important condition atlantic city blackjack card counting all�the heat.
Top players can always beat the cards.
Sometimes that aspect is trivial.
AC has had all kinds of attractive games�hole-carding, tracking, cutting, machine plays, comp plays, tournaments, loss rebates, to name some.
There is one more benefit to serious APs.
These backroomings lead to violent click here, illegal searches, and illegal detentions.
Many players, myself included, are afraid to go to certain casinos, due to the possible ugly confrontation that may occur.
You miss the point in saying that there is a middle ground between offering unbeatable games and barring players.
Just make every game total crap and you drive away the very few skilled players without antagonizing the morons in the least.
Yet, the ploppies flock to such games and keep the casinos happy.
So your elaboration shows that my video poker analogy is in fact perfect: the casinos put it in at the beginning with decent rules�as were the AC games years ago�because they were marketing to the masses, not trying to beat every single player.
As casinos realized you could give the masses garbage and they would still eat it up, the casinos tightened up https://microrcracing.com/blackjack/blackjack-online-cash.html rules and payoffs.
This was a nationwide deterioration having nothing to do with pros or the ability to bar pros.
AC has to compete with Atlantic city blackjack card counting />Every casino in Pennsylvania has the same blackjack rules by law, and they are very player friendly.
You are right, the casinos in AC have much better rules than you will find in most places on the Strip.
For hobbyist counters, the Uston lawsuits had no impact atlantic city blackjack card counting on technical conditions, but were somewhat favorable due to the reduction in major heat backroomings, etc.
For pro APs, the Uston lawsuits were awesome.
From the way you summed it up it seems being identified and known is how a pro AP loses in AC.
What was it like on the ground in Atlantic city blackjack card counting 2 days or a week https://microrcracing.com/blackjack/biloxi-blackjack-tournaments.html the decision Mr.
Grosjean, you are my hero!
When I scout casinos, I barely notice those things.
Every AP and blackjack atlantic city blackjack card counting knows atlantic city blackjack card counting that penetration is the single most important factor affecting SCORE for any particular blackjack game!
Basically, heat prevents the AP from playing optimally � from making camouflage atlantic city blackjack card counting to outright barrings.
Every Blackjack orte and blackjack author knows incontrovertibly that penetration is the single most important factor affecting SCORE for any particular blackjack game!
I know quite a few APs, and several authors.
Penetration is barely on our list.
SCORE is a narrow measure designed largely for counting games.
You really think hole-carders or sequencers care about penetration?
I cannot remember rules ever entering article source our game selection.
The shuffle procedure on every table game is of much greater interest to us.
We have logged significant hours on every major table game.
In fact, 6:5 was a huge benefit to many pros, because it reduced heat on games that were vulnerable to beyond-counting methods.
I get what you are saying.
It was just a matter of me comparing apples counting to oranges other AP methods.
Keep up the fight!
Leave a Reply Your email address will not be published.
Sign me up for: Question of the Day - Daily email with that day's answer to questions about Vegas.
LVA Deals - Weekly email with hand-picked discounts on rooms, food, entertainment, and activities.
LVA Weekly - Weekly e-digest with featured content from LasVegasAdvisor.
The expertise to be found here spans the full spectrum of casino games, advantage-play techniques, and legal-wagering opportunities in the U.

G66YY644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

Going back to Dustin Hoffman in �Rain Man� or sensationalized tales of the MIT blackjack team, card counting stories tend to be nerd-revenge.


Enjoy!
Atlantic City Blackjack Guide 2020 | Learn its Rules & Strategy
Valid for casinos
Atlantic City Blackjack - Strategy and How to Play
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
For people who interested in dealing with reality and not suppositions, presumptions and just plain old erroneous statements, here are two pieces dealing with card counting: This is proof that the doofus who was running the Trop at the time for Icahn didn't understand the first thing about the game and what was happening: Live blackjack Card Counting Teams Rape Atlantic City Casinos for Millions May 12, 2011 Written by: Nick Meisher card counting teams hit Atlantic City In an epic attack upon the beleaguered Atlantic City casinos, multiple blackjack card counting teams atlantic city blackjack card counting millions this April from Borgata and Tropicana casinos.
In April of 2011, a number of professional blackjack teams using the latest card counting systems descended upon Atlantic City, known as the jewel of New Confirm. free online blackjack card games pity, and came away with millions from Tropicana atlantic city blackjack card counting Borgata casino blackjack tables.
Considering past earning, during the month of April, a total of 9-11 million was lost at the Borgata, and 7-9 million at the Tropicana only at the blackjack tables.
The normal monthly profit from an Atlantic City casino blackjack card game tables is around 11%-16% of the total amount bet.
When a group of such professional blackjack players work as a single unit, and with a large enough bankroll, the casinos stand very little chance of coming out on top.
The CEO of Tropicana Casino, Mr.
The CEO would not identify the player.
The NJ Casino Control Commission spokesman, Mr.
The casino licensee may determine after each round of play that the cards should be reshuffled;" Here is a key decision that affected counting: This syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court.
It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader.
It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Supreme Court.
Please note that, in the interests of brevity, portions of any opinion may not have been summarized.
Adamar of New Jersey, Inc.
This appeal presents several issues.
The first is whether the Casino Control Commission CCC has exclusive jurisdiction over claims by patrons against casinos for discrimination and breach of contract.
A related issue is whether patrons may maintain pokerstars casino claims as common-law causes of action.
The final issue questions the award of damages on the malicious prosecution claim.
Campione was a blackjack player and professional card counter who frequented casinos in Atlantic City.
Defendants are Adamar of New Jersey, which operates the TropWorld Casino, and various employees of TropWorld.
Campione alleges that on two occasions, TropWorld allowed other blackjack players, but not him, to play multiple hands and to increase their bets.
On the second occasion, Campione became involved in a dispute with TropWorld personnel and refused to remove his hands from his cards and leave the game as directed.
Campione was arrested, and an employee signed a complaint in municipal court charging Campione with disorderly conduct and defiant trespass.
In municipal court, Campione was acquitted of the criminal charges.
Campione filed this action in the Law Division seeking both compensatory and punitive damages, alleging malicious prosecution, discrimination, and breach of contract.
TropWorld answered and moved for summary judgment, arguing that the CCC regulations authorize different treatment of card counters; that the CCC had exclusive jurisdiction over claims concerning the application of CCC regulations; and that no cause of action existed for damages for a violation of CCC regulations.
The trial court denied the motion, stating, among other things, that it is discriminatory to treat card counters differently from other patrons at the same table.
The Appellate Division reversed the judgment and remanded to the Law Division.
It expressed grave reservations about the Law Division's ruling that a casino must treat card counters and other patrons equally, noting that the CCC had adopted regulations that specifically authorize some disparate treatment.
The Appellate Division also concluded that the CCC had exclusive jurisdiction regarding the application and interpretation of the rules of the games, and that the Law Division therefore should not have entertained Campione's complaint.
Finally, the Appellate Division held that the CCC had the power to order a casino to visit web page restitution to a patron and gave Campione 60 days to submit his complaints to the CCC.
The Supreme Court granted Campione's petition for certification.
It also granted motions of the CCC and the Division of Gaming Enforcement DGE to intervene and granted their petitions for certification.
HELD: The CCC has primary jurisdiction to resolve issues concerning the interpretation of the Casino Control Act and the CCC's regulations.
A casino patron does not have a private cause of action under the Act or the CCC's regulations where no such cause of action existed at common law.
The errors in the jury instructions require reversal of the damage award on the malicious prosecution claim.
The CCC is responsible for promulgating regulations controlling the operation of authorized games.
It is also authorized to adjudicate regulatory violations.
Initial complaints are filed with the CCC, which refers them to the DGE for prosecution if it finds evidence of a violation.
The CCC has adopted regulations authorizing casinos to take specific countermeasures against card counters.
In addition, casinos have made use of other regulations that were not intended to be used as countermeasures, but which the CCC has impliedly permitted by approving the casinos' internal controls.
The CCC has primary jurisdiction to resolve issues concerning the interpretation of the Act and its regulations.
The Legislature has not, however, granted the CCC jurisdiction over a patron's common law claims.
Nor did it intend that the CCC be a court of claims for actions arising under the Act.
The CCC is limited in such proceedings to requiring restitution and imposing administrative sanctions.
If the CCC summarily rejects a patron's complaint, the patron does not have the right to request a hearing before the CCC.
The place for patrons to file private claims for damages is in the Superior Court.
To the extent that the resolution of a patron's claim depends on an interpretation of the Act or administrative regulations, those questions should be referred to the CCC for resolution.
There is no private right of action by a patron against a casino for money damages unless the claim has a basis in the common law.
Campione's claim of discriminatory treatment does have a common-law basis.
Even without statutory or regulatory support, a casino has a common-law duty to treat patrons fairly.
Remaining is the issue whether the CCC permits casinos to discriminate among patrons in the manner alleged by Campione.
On remand, the Law Division should refer that question to the CCC so that it may interpret its own regulations.
The trial court's instructions on the discrimination claim in effect told the jury that defendants had been guilty of invidious discrimination.
This instruction also had the capacity to prejudice defendants with regard to the malicious prosecution claim.
In addition, the malicious prosecution charge failed to relate the law to the facts of the case, many of which were in dispute.
CHIEF JUSTICE PORITZ and JUSTICES HANDLER, O'HERN, GARIBALDI, STEIN and COLEMAN join in JUSTICE POLLOCK's opinion.
Sancho, Where's your proof that the news articles and Don Johnson are both wrong about the banning claims?
Please provide some evidence other than basically just saying nuh huh.
Quote: odiousgambit Wow; New Jersey actually excludes people based on where they got their money from before they came in and played with it?
Respondent has no known legitimate source of income which would account for the amount of cash buy-ins which he has made and on at least one occasion, money with which the Respondent and an associate attempted to make a cash buy-in was found by a drug-sniffing dog to be tainted money.
I mean, I get that he did some gambling before he was of age, but he was twenty-four when they excluded him, and had bought in for at least a quarter of a million dollars since becoming of legal age.
The only real complaint against him seems to be how he makes his money before he enters the casino.
I figured it was all green.
Quote: SanchoPanza For people who interested in dealing with reality and not suppositions, presumptions and just plain old erroneous statements, here are two pieces dealing with card counting: This is proof that the doofus who was running the Trop at the time for Icahn didn't understand the first thing about the game and what was happening: Blackjack Card Counting Teams Rape Atlantic City Casinos for Millions May 12, 2011 Written by: Nick Meisher card counting teams hit Atlantic City In an epic attack upon the beleaguered Atlantic City casinos, multiple blackjack card counting teams reaped millions this April from Borgata and Tropicana casinos.
In April of 2011, a number of professional blackjack teams using the latest card counting systems descended upon Atlantic City, known as the jewel of New Jersey, and came away with millions from Tropicana and Borgata casino blackjack tables.
Considering past earning, during the month of April, a total of 9-11 million was lost at the Borgata, and 7-9 million at the Tropicana only at the blackjack tables.
The normal monthly profit from an Big dog mower prices City casino blackjack card game tables is around 11%-16% of the total amount bet.
I lived in NJ for many years.
AC more info not known as the jewel of anything.
Quote: Wizard from the article "A smart player could gain an advantage with even a 10 percent rebate in blackjack.
Later on in that article, someone else even says the Trop invited him back: Quote: Johnson is adamant that he didn't count cards, but that doesn't mean he didn't have a system.
So I'm not sure what all the fuss is about.
Nothing appears to have changed from a legal standpoint.
Is there some reason to believe that Uston v Resorts and Campione v Adamar are no longer precedential case law?
Nothing appears to have changed from a legal standpoint.
Is there some reason to believe that Uston v Resorts and Campione v Adamar are no atlantic city blackjack card counting precedential case law?
Yes, it has changed thanks to deregulation.
Johnson is banned from the Taj and Resorts, but the Tropicana is allowing him to play.
Quote: Keyser Where's your proof that the news articles and Don Johnson are both wrong about the banning claims?
Please provide some evidence other than basically just saying nuh huh.
You haven't shown one news article or Johnson saying he was banned in Atlantic City.
The first quotation is from a posting of yours here that was a quotation but never bothered to give the citation: "Johnson says he's been banned at the Caesars and Harrah's casinos in Nevada and was turned down by Resorts and Trump Taj Mahal Casino Resort in Atlantic City.
And he says casinos no long offer him a 20 percent discount on his losses or shower him with other high-roller perks.
It's a business decision.
Quote: Keyser Yes, it has changed thanks to deregulation.
Johnson is banned from the Taj and Resorts, but the Tropicana is allowing him to play.
Where did you read that Johnson was barred as a card counter?
Also, NJ S-12 isn't about deregulation at all.
It's about making regulation more efficient by eliminating redundancies in oversight.
Nothing in S-12 changes the principles of Uston v Resorts that private property owners in a heavily-regulated industry do not have a common-law right to arbitrarily exclude members of the public.
From the Court in Uston: "Absent a valid contrary rule by atlantic city blackjack card counting Commission, Uston possesses the usual right of reasonable access to Resorts International's blackjack tables.
Here we go, again.
Please read it carefully this time.
With the casinos still struggling to recover from the economic recession, the last thing they need is a shark gambler to come along and win tens of millions of dollars playing blackjack.
That is exactly what happened for Dan Johnson.
That winning streak has put Johnson on the outs with several casinos.
In the old days, Las Vegas casinos were run by mobsters, and they would have ways of dealing with a gambler who took too much of their money.
Today, however, things are much more calm, and casinos use more diplomatic ways of ridding themselves of gamblers who win too much.
Caesars and Harrah's in Nevada and the Trump Taj Mahal in Atlantic City have banned the blackjack player from enjoying the game he loves at their casinos.
No evidence has been revealed to show that Johnson won the money by cheating, but the casinos figured they would cut their losses nonetheless.
He should have no problem finding action if he wants it.
Pennsylvania has made a strong push to become the gambling capital of the East Coast in the past couple of years, and New Jersey casinos have not responded.
Analysts believe that by the end of 2012, Pennsylvania casinos will have passed New Jersey casinos in overall gaming revenue.
Did you catch the paragraph that says the following, "Caesars and Harrah's in Nevada and the Trump Taj Mahal in Atlantic City have banned the blackjack player from enjoying the game he loves at their casinos.
No evidence has been revealed to show that Johnson won the money by cheating, but the casinos figured they would cut their losses nonetheless.

T7766547
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

In an epic attack upon the beleaguered Atlantic City casinos, multiple blackjack card counting teams reaped millions this April from Borgata and�...


Enjoy!
FYI. AC Can Now Ban AP Players. - Table Games - Gambling - Page 4 - Forums - Wizard of Vegas
Valid for casinos
YouTube
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
atlantic city blackjack card counting

CODE5637
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 200

Answer 1 of 47: As someone who is pretty new to AC gambling (I turned 22 last year). I've also recently starting hitting my 12's against the dealer's up card, 2 - something I've never done in the past.. (Assuming you are not counting cards).


Enjoy!
"Ken Uston Ruined Atlantic City"�Discuss. - Gambling With An Edge
Valid for casinos
Blackjack player who took Atlantic City casinos for $15 million says rules put the math on his side | Casinos & Tourism | microrcracing.com
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
For people who atlantic city blackjack card counting in dealing with reality and not suppositions, presumptions and just plain old erroneous statements, here are two pieces dealing with card counting: This is proof that the doofus who was running the Trop at the time for Icahn didn't understand the first thing about the game and what was happening: Blackjack Card Counting Teams Rape Atlantic City Casinos for Millions May 12, 2011 Written by: Nick Meisher card counting teams hit Atlantic City In an epic attack upon atlantic city blackjack card counting beleaguered Atlantic City casinos, multiple blackjack card counting teams reaped millions this April from Borgata and Tropicana casinos.
In April of 2011, a number of professional blackjack teams using the latest card counting systems descended upon Atlantic City, known as the jewel of New Jersey, and came away with millions from Tropicana and Borgata casino blackjack tables.
Considering past earning, during the month of April, a total of 9-11 million was lost at the Borgata, and 7-9 million at atlantic city blackjack card counting Tropicana only at the blackjack visit web page />The normal monthly profit from an Atlantic City casino blackjack card game tables is around 11%-16% of the total amount bet.
When a group of such professional blackjack players work as a single unit, and with a large enough bankroll, the casinos stand very little chance of coming out on top.
The CEO of Tropicana Casino, Mr.
The CEO would not identify the player.
The NJ Casino Control Commission spokesman, Mr.
The casino licensee may determine after each round of play that the cards should be reshuffled;" Here is a key decision that affected counting: Atlantic city blackjack card counting syllabus is not part of the opinion of the Court.
It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader.
It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Supreme Court.
Please note that, in the interests of brevity, portions of any opinion may not have been summarized.
Adamar of New Jersey, Inc.
This appeal presents several issues.
The first is whether the Casino Control Commission CCC has exclusive jurisdiction over claims by patrons against casinos for discrimination and breach of contract.
A related issue is whether patrons may maintain such claims as common-law causes of action.
The final issue questions the award of damages on the malicious prosecution claim.
Campione was a blackjack player and professional card counter who frequented casinos in Atlantic City.
Defendants are Adamar of New Jersey, which operates the TropWorld Casino, and various employees of TropWorld.
Campione alleges that on two occasions, TropWorld allowed other blackjack players, but not him, to play multiple hands and to increase their bets.
On the second occasion, Campione became involved in a dispute with TropWorld personnel and refused to remove his hands from his cards and leave the game as directed.
Campione was arrested, and an employee click at this page a complaint in municipal court charging Campione with disorderly conduct and defiant trespass.
In municipal court, Campione was acquitted of the criminal charges.
Campione filed this action in the Law Division seeking both compensatory and punitive damages, alleging malicious prosecution, discrimination, and breach of contract.
casinos strategy blackjack switch in vegas answered and moved for summary judgment, arguing that the CCC regulations authorize different treatment of card counters; that the CCC had exclusive jurisdiction over claims concerning the application of CCC regulations; and that no cause of action existed for damages for a violation of CCC regulations.
The trial court denied the motion, stating, among other things, that it is discriminatory to treat card counters differently from other patrons at the same table.
The Appellate Division reversed the judgment and remanded to the Law Division.
It expressed grave reservations about the Law Division's ruling that a casino must treat card counters and other patrons equally, noting that the CCC had adopted regulations that specifically authorize some disparate treatment.
The Appellate Division game example blackjack concluded that the CCC had exclusive jurisdiction regarding the application and interpretation of the rules of the games, and that the Law Division therefore should not have entertained Campione's complaint.
Finally, the Appellate Division held that the CCC had the power to order a casino to make restitution to a patron and gave Campione 60 days to submit click here complaints to the CCC.
The Supreme Court granted Campione's petition for certification.
It also granted motions of the CCC and the Division of Gaming Enforcement DGE to intervene and granted their petitions for certification.
HELD: The CCC has primary jurisdiction to resolve issues concerning the interpretation of the Casino Control Act and the CCC's regulations.
A casino patron does not have a private cause of action under the Act or the CCC's regulations where no such cause of action existed at common law.
The errors in the jury instructions require reversal of the damage award on the malicious prosecution claim.
The CCC is responsible for promulgating regulations controlling the operation of authorized games.
It is also authorized to adjudicate regulatory violations.
Initial complaints are filed with the CCC, which refers them to the DGE for prosecution if it finds evidence of a violation.
The CCC has adopted regulations authorizing casinos to take specific countermeasures against card counters.
In addition, casinos have made use of other regulations that were not intended to be used as countermeasures, but which the CCC has impliedly permitted by approving the casinos' internal controls.
The CCC has primary jurisdiction to resolve issues concerning the interpretation of the Act and its regulations.
The Legislature has not, however, granted the CCC jurisdiction over a patron's common law claims.
Nor did it intend that the CCC be a court of claims for actions arising under the Act.
The CCC is limited in such proceedings to requiring restitution and imposing administrative sanctions.
If the CCC summarily rejects a patron's complaint, the patron does not have the right to request a hearing before the CCC.
The place for patrons to file private claims for damages is in the Superior Court.
To the extent that the resolution of a patron's claim depends on an interpretation of the Act or administrative regulations, those questions should be referred to the CCC for resolution.
There is no private right of action by a patron against a casino for money damages unless the claim has a basis in the common law.
Campione's claim of discriminatory treatment does have a common-law basis.
Even without statutory or regulatory support, a casino has a common-law duty to treat patrons fairly.
Remaining is the issue whether the CCC permits casinos to discriminate among patrons in the manner alleged by Campione.
On remand, the Law Division should refer that question to the CCC so that it may interpret its own regulations.
The trial court's instructions on the discrimination claim in effect told the jury that defendants had been guilty of invidious discrimination.
This instruction also had the capacity to prejudice defendants with regard to the malicious prosecution claim.
In addition, atlantic city blackjack card counting malicious prosecution charge failed to relate the law to the facts of the case, many of which were in dispute.
CHIEF JUSTICE PORITZ and JUSTICES HANDLER, O'HERN, GARIBALDI, STEIN and COLEMAN join in JUSTICE POLLOCK's opinion.
Sancho, Where's your proof that the news articles and Don Johnson are both wrong about the banning claims?
Please provide some evidence other than basically just saying nuh huh.
Quote: odiousgambit Wow; New Jersey actually excludes people based on where they got their money from before they came in and played with it?
Respondent has no known legitimate source of income which would account for the amount of cash buy-ins which he has made and on at least one occasion, money with which the Respondent and an associate attempted to make a cash buy-in was found by a drug-sniffing dog to be tainted money.
I mean, I get that he did some gambling before he was of age, but he was twenty-four when they excluded him, and had bought in for at least a quarter of a million dollars since becoming of legal age.
The only real complaint against him seems to be how he makes his money before he enters the casino.
I figured it was all green.
Quote: SanchoPanza For people who interested in dealing with reality and not suppositions, presumptions and just going all in blackjack old erroneous statements, here are two pieces dealing with card counting: This is proof that the doofus who was running the Trop at the time for Icahn didn't understand the first thing about the game article source what was happening: Blackjack Card Counting Teams Rape Atlantic City Casinos for Millions May 12, 2011 Written by: Nick Meisher card counting teams hit Atlantic City In an epic attack upon the beleaguered Atlantic City casinos, multiple blackjack card counting teams reaped millions this April from Borgata and Tropicana casinos.
In April of 2011, a number of professional blackjack teams using the latest card counting systems descended upon Atlantic City, known as the jewel of New Jersey, and came away with millions from Tropicana and Borgata casino blackjack tables.
Considering past earning, during the month of April, a total of 9-11 million was lost at the Borgata, and 7-9 million at the Tropicana only at the blackjack tables.
check this out normal monthly profit from an Atlantic City casino blackjack card game tables is around 11%-16% of the total amount bet.
I lived in NJ for many years.
AC is not known as the jewel of anything.
Quote: Wizard from the article "A smart player could gain an advantage with even a 10 percent rebate in blackjack.
Later on in that article, someone else even says the Trop invited him back: Quote: Johnson is adamant that he didn't count cards, but that doesn't mean he didn't have a system.
So I'm not sure what all the fuss is about.
Nothing appears to have changed from a legal standpoint.
Is there some reason to believe that Uston v Resorts and Campione v Adamar are no longer precedential case law?
Nothing appears to have changed from a legal atlantic city blackjack card counting />Is there some reason to believe that Uston v Resorts and Campione v Adamar are no longer precedential case law?
Yes, it has changed thanks to deregulation.
Johnson is banned from the Taj and Resorts, but the Tropicana is allowing him to play.
Quote: Keyser Where's your proof that the news articles and Don Johnson are both wrong about the banning claims?
Please provide some evidence other than basically just saying nuh huh.
You haven't shown one news article or Johnson saying he was banned in Atlantic City.
The first quotation is from a posting of yours here that was a quotation but never bothered to give the citation: "Johnson says he's been banned at the Caesars and Harrah's casinos in Nevada and was turned down by Resorts and Trump Taj Mahal Casino Resort in Atlantic City.
And he says casinos no long offer him a 20 percent discount on his losses or shower him with other high-roller perks.
It's a business decision.
Quote: Keyser Yes, it has changed thanks to deregulation.
Johnson is banned from the Taj and Resorts, but the Tropicana is allowing him to play.
Where did you read that Johnson was barred as a card counter?
Also, NJ S-12 isn't about deregulation at all.
It's about making regulation more efficient by eliminating redundancies in oversight.
Nothing in S-12 changes the principles of Uston v Resorts that private property owners in a atlantic city blackjack card counting industry do not have a common-law right to arbitrarily exclude members of the public.
From the Court in Uston: "Absent a valid contrary rule by the Commission, Uston possesses the usual right of reasonable access to Resorts International's blackjack tables.
Here we go, again.
Please read it carefully this time.
With the casinos still struggling to recover from the economic recession, the last thing they need is a shark gambler to come along and win tens of millions of dollars playing blackjack.
That is exactly what happened for Dan Johnson.
That winning streak has put Johnson on the outs with several casinos.
In the old days, Las Vegas casinos were run by mobsters, and they would have ways of dealing with a gambler who took too much of their money.
Today, however, things are much more calm, and casinos use more diplomatic ways of ridding themselves of gamblers who win too much.
Caesars and Harrah's in Nevada and the Trump Taj Mahal in Atlantic City have banned the blackjack player from enjoying the game he loves at their casinos.
No evidence has been revealed to show that Johnson won the money by cheating, but the casinos figured they would cut their losses nonetheless.
He should have no problem finding action atlantic city blackjack card counting he wants it.
Pennsylvania has made a strong push to become the gambling capital of the East Coast in the past couple of years, and New Jersey casinos have not responded.
Analysts believe that by the end of 2012, Pennsylvania casinos will have passed New Jersey casinos in overall gaming revenue.
Did you catch the paragraph that says the following, "Caesars and Harrah's in Nevada and the Trump Taj Mahal in Atlantic City have banned the blackjack player from enjoying the game he loves at their casinos.
No evidence has been revealed to show that Johnson won the money by cheating, but the casinos figured they would cut their losses nonetheless.

JK644W564
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

Even when there is a known card counter at a table it doesn't mean the casino will.. By 1978, there were two places you could play (Vegas and Atlantic City).


Enjoy!
Atlantic City Blackjack Guide 2020 | Learn its Rules & Strategy
Valid for casinos
YouTube
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
Can You Count Cards At Online Blackjack?

A67444455
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
50 xB
Max cash out:
$ 200

Atlantic City has been suffering on the whole and the casinos within this. that the casinos there are not allowed to kick-out or ban players for card counting.


Enjoy!
Counting in Atlantic City - Blackjack and Card Counting Forums
Valid for casinos
Web Filter Violation
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
Ever Heard of the Blackjack 'Experiment' in Atlantic City? A Card Counter's Dream!

TT6335644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

A shuffle through the Gaming mailbag: Q. Explain to me like I'm 5 why counting cards works for blackjack players. My college buddy said it's�...


Enjoy!
The Man Who Broke Atlantic City - The Atlantic
Valid for casinos
counting cards is legal in Atlantic City, but if they suspect you of it they'll ... | Hacker News
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
atlantic city blackjack card counting